Skip to main content

EA Still Hasn't Learned From Sims 4's Kit Backlash | Screen Rant

Fans of The Sims 4 are angry at EA as it appears the developer hasn't learned anything from the backlash and controversy over the game's Kits. The continued release of Kits - the most recent of which being Sims 4's Carnaval Streetwear Kit - demonstrates that EA had not listened to the Sims 4 community, many of whom disliked the smaller content packs when they initially launched. A lot of Sims 4 players have taken to social media and message boards to express their anger as they feel EA is ignoring their concerns, with the game having seen more Kits instead of more significant additions over the last year.

Kits were first introduced to Sims 4 as tiny DLCs in March 2021 with the simultaneous release of Bust the Dust, Country Kitchen, and Throwback Fit that same month. As time has gone on, more Kits have come out alongside other DLCs for the Sims 4. Each Sims 4 DLC Kit is a small collection of items related to Kits focus, with Bust the Dust also providing players with a small amount of new gameplay mechanics.

Related: Games That Expand On The Sims 4’s Features

Since their release, the Sims 4 Kits have been a controversial and divisive issue among the fanbase. There are currently 10 Kits available for players to purchase and provide a mixture of building, clothing, and limited gameplay. However, some Sims 4 fans are angry as they don't believe the small number of assets justifies the price of the Kits.

One of Sims 4 players' main issues with the Kits is their price. Currently, the total cost for the Sims 4, if a player were to buy all expansions packs, stuff packs, game packs, and Kits, is over $800.00. Granted, the Sims 4 has been out for almost eight years, but that works out at a whopping $100 per year for Simmers.

From a certain point of view, Kits do make sense as they do not have as much content as the other packs and are what the Sims teams describe as hyper-focused. They were not designed to appeal to everyone, with each of the current Kits available focusing on different aspects of Sims 4 gameplay. However, many Simmers still feel that the Sims 4 Kits are not worth buying and do not justify their $4.99 price tag.

Many Sims 4 players feel that the items in the Kits should be in expansion, stuff, or game packs. Other Sims 4 players have drawn comparisons to the infamous Sims 3 store, which had plays buy Sims Points with real money to buy additional items for their game. The costs soon added up for players, and to some, the Kits look like a worrying step back towards microtransactions.

Related: How Much Money The Sims 4 Makes Per Minute, According To Data

The Sims 4 has several kinds of DLC that it releases, varying in size and quality. Expansions, stuff packs, game packs, and now Kits leave fans feeling that EA wants to make as much money as possible from an already established fanbase. However, other fans argue that if players don't want to buy the Kits, they are under no obligation to do so, and thus the community is divided on the issue.

Another issue to consider is the role that the Covid-19 pandemic could have played and its influence on the development and release of the Kits. EA could have decided to release smaller content packs to appease a community accustomed to having more. It could have been easier to release smaller packs with so many team members off work or working remotely.

Although perhaps initially intended as palate cleansers by The Sims 4 team, the continued release of the Kits has left many Sims fans feeling disappointed. Smaller hyperfocused packs mean that at least one or two will appeal in such a varied fanbase though. Ultimately, EA has a business to run, and Kits make good business sense, even if many players may prefer more substantial updates.

Next: Sims 4: Most Expensive Properties In Real Money (According To Data)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...