Skip to main content

Game Of Thrones' Character Changes Caused A Weird Stark Coincidence

Game of Thrones completely changed the storylines of two different characters from the books, which unintentionally caused an odd Stark family coincidence. When adapting the books for the HBO series, Game of Thrones notably left out significant characters, giving their storylines to other characters or new figures. While certain cut Game of Thrones book characters like Young Griff, Lady Stoneheart, Arianne Martell, and Jon Connington changed major aspects of Game of Thrones’ story, two notable characters with the same name were coincidentally cut from House Stark’s larger story.

The overall journey of House Stark in Game of Thrones remained relatively unchanged in Game of Thrones’ adaptation to the screen, but certain deleted characters introduced far more tragic circumstances for the main Stark children. When Robb Stark’s wife became Talisa Maegyr, the shocking season 3 Red Wedding became all the more brutal when she was stabbed in her pregnant stomach. The most significant omission of another character changed the stories of both Arya and Sansa Stark attempting to hide their identities in Westeros, with both of the biggest missing House Stark characters sharing an odd similarity.

Related: Game of Thrones: Jon Snow's Ending Would've Been Better With A Cut Book Character

One of the first major changes to Game of Thrones’ story was the HBO series leaving out Jeyne Pool, Sansa’s best friend who traveled with her to King’s Landing because her father was the steward of Winterfell. Jeyne Pool was cut from Game of Thrones, which also meant erasing the storyline where she is smuggled out of King’s Landing and given to Petyr Baelish, who poses her as Arya Stark after Arya was assumed dead. Jeyne is then married to Ramsay Bolton as Fake Arya in order to seal an alliance with the Boltons, with this storyline being taken over by Sansa in Game of Thrones season 5, who is still in the Vale in the books. The next most important cut character for the Stark story, Robb Stark’s wife, shares an odd coincidence with the former, as both are named Jeyne and happen to be the only Jeynes significant to Game of Thones’ plot.

When writing Robb’s wife, Jeyne Westerling, into the series, Game of Thrones completely upended her character, renaming her Talisa Maegyr as a Volantene noblewoman rather than a girl from an impoverished house serving House Lannister. The Jeynes weren’t connected by anything other than their close relationship to the Stark storylines, but it’s odd that two of the most significant Game of Thrones characters that Benioff and Weiss chose to change shared the same name. The replacement of Jeyne Westerling's character was already in motion during the production of Game of Thrones season 2, but changing her name was suggested by writer George R.R. Martin, who revealed at Worldcon 2012 that it would cause too much confusion to keep her name as Jeyne when her story was so different.

While Jeyne Westerling was completely erased in Game of Thrones, Jeyne Poole actually does make one appearance in Game of Thrones’ season 1 pilot in which she sits next to Sansa at the feast. She isn’t named, but Benioff and Weiss revealed in the episode’s commentary that Sansa’s friend is, in fact, Jeyne Poole. While Martin tried to include Poole again, Benioff and Weiss decided that they wanted Sansa Stark to be a much more prominent character with her tragic storyline, which meant cutting Jeyne Poole and having the future Queen in the North take over the Ramsay plotline. When considering that the majority of significant Stark characters remained in HBO’s Game of Thrones adaptation, it’s still a weird coincidence that the two Jeynes were so notably changed.

Next: Sansa Was Always A Warg (Like Bran) - Book Changes & Theory Explained



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...