Skip to main content

Jeffrey Wright Is Both Right & Wrong About The Batman's Sequel Villains

DC's upcoming film The Batman is giving the Caped Crusader a new life outside of the DCEU, but actor Jeffrey Wright feels the movie's sequel should have new villains - and he's both right and wrong. Starring Robert Pattinson as billionaire vigilante Bruce Wayne, The Batman is the first movie to feature a new actor as Batman following Ben Affleck announcing his departure from the role after his last turn in Justice League. It also marks the first Batman solo film since Christian Bale last suited up in 2012's The Dark Knight Rises. While Affleck leaving after reprising the role one last time in the upcoming Flash movie has left a lot of questions regarding the future of Batman and all of the Bat Family characters in the DCEU, The Batman's departure from the shared universe gives the Matt Reeves Batman franchise a lot of freedom.

In an interview with Screen Rant, Jeffrey Wright - who plays Detective Jim Gordon in The Batman - addressed that freedom. When asked about which villains he would like to see Pattinson's Batman face in future The Batman movies, he mentioned that Batman has a lot of interesting villains in his popular Rogues Gallery, but that there could also be an opportunity for their franchise to create new villains. Director Matt Reeves has received a lot of attention for The Batman's new takes on the classic Batman rogues like Catwoman (Zoe Kravitz) and the Riddler (Paul Dano). Should Reeves' Batman franchise be focused on adapting existing characters from the Batman comics, or is this the perfect opportunity to try creating entirely new villains?

Related: Robert Pattinson's The Batman 2 Dream Supports First Movie Villain Theory

Jeffrey Wright is both right and wrong about how The Batman franchise should approach villains in the future. For one thing, Wright is right that the Batman TV series has a history of creating new villainous characters for the screen. The most successful example in the past few decades is Harley Quinn, who was created as a love interest for The Joker in Batman: The Animated Series. When it works well, you get one of the most popular characters in the DC canon. However, Batman has perhaps the most iconic villains of any superhero, some of whom deserve big-screen revivals the way Reeves is doing with Catwoman, Riddler, and Penguin. Batman also has a lot of interesting villains that have yet to be adapted on the silver screen. While there's certainly room to create new villains for Bruce Wayne, it would be a lost opportunity to bring some of Batman's most dynamic villains to life.

The biggest argument in favor of creating new villains is Harley Quinn. Since debuting on TV in 1992, Harley Quinn has become one of DC's most popular characters, especially following Margot Robbie's portrayal of her in the DCEU. Not only has she been a good supporting character for Batman in the last 30 years, but she has become extremely successful in her own right. However, replicating the success of a character like Harley Quinn would be difficult. Even without her level of popularity, creating a new villain that audiences actually like is a gamble. Batman already has iconic villains, which are much more likely to be well-received by DC fans.

A better move would be to adapt some of Batman's villains who never or rarely have live-action interpretations. The Court of Owls, for instance, who are a secret society of wealthy Gothamites who have controlled Gotham for centuries, are often at odds with Batman in the comics. Robert Pattinson's Batman is new to the cowl, which also makes this franchise the perfect place to introduce the Court of Owls, who would be frustrated with Gotham's new vigilante - to name just one example.

Creating original villains for The Batman could work and has worked for the hero in the past, but it would probably serve the Batverse better to make use of Batman's existing villains. With Robert Pattinson as Batman, Matt Reeves has already promised a different take on the Caped Crusader. The Batman movies should also look to create new takes on Batman's villains.

More: The Batman's Batverse Plan Is Perfect (So Why's It Never Happened Before?)



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...
Post a Comment
Read more