Skip to main content

Selling Sunset: Emma & Peter Reportedly ‘Not Dating’ Despite Being Spotted

After Selling Sunset's tense fourth season between Christine Quinn and Emma Hernan, Emma has been revealed to be spending time with Peter Cornell outside of the office. While season 4 covered a number of captivating storylines, one of the most talked-about ones had to do with Emma's involvement with an ex of Christine's. While both agents have vastly different recollections of the past, the two have yet to resolve their feud. A majority of the office has taken Emma's side in the argument, but Christine has neglected to retract any of her accusations about Emma or Peter.

Almost everyone involved in the office theatrics has come to the conclusion that Christine has not been upfront about what really happened, creating unreasonable drama regarding Emma's relationship with Peter. Shedding tears on-screen after feeling betrayed, Christine appears unwilling to let go of the past. While Emma has handled the accusations with maturity, she even admitted that she cannot be friends with Christine in light of her supposed fabrications of the past.

Related: Selling Sunset: Amanza Calls Christine 'Malicious' In New Instagram Post

While some rumors say that Peter and Emma may be more than friends after being seen outside of work together, Us Weekly received confirmation from a source that the agents "are not dating." With a complicated history, Peter and Emma appear to have ended their romance on good terms, willing to work and even spend time together off the clock. Both Peter and Emma seem to want to avoid the drama with Christine all together, with Emma expressing her annoyance and shock about the situation. The reality star expressed that she was unaware of the drama with Christine until "the day [she] met her." She explained that "it was not pleasant" having to drudge up the past with Christine, especially with a handful of false accusations. With Emma believing Christine to be lying about her engagement to Peter, Emma shared how Peter (and herself) has seen through Christine's dishonest recollections, which are "not even negotiable" to the former couple. Remaining as just friends, Emma and Peter seem to have bonded over their confrontations with Christine and their journey to preserve the truth about their relationship. Unwilling to give Christine's story any space in their minds, the two have seemingly decided to ignore her version of the story.

Emma and Peter have gotten over the drama, for the most part, left "eye-rolling" their way through the situation. While the two are presently still spending time together, Christine seems less content with how things ended up. For a long while, Peter's identity was kept secretive, left out of the media and off of the Netflix series, but he has been openly connected to both Oppenheim agents. After this integral revelation for fans of the series, Christine explained that there is more to the story than anyone thinks, with plenty of things having happened "behind closed doors." Clearly frustrated with disbelief about the claims regarding Emma, Christine shared that she "hated that everyone thought that they knew [her] and thought that they knew the story." Still not revealing all the details of her romance with Peter, fans are left guessing about the truth regarding Peter's various relationships.

With hope for reconciliation come Selling Sunset season 5, Emma and Christine may find a way to put their differences aside. While the two have yet to make amends, fans will be eagerly awaiting to see how the two interact in the next season of the series. Peter and Christine's relationship still poses many questions, with many fans still debating whether or not Christine's tearful accounts have any shed of truth to them.

Next: Selling Sunset: Clues That Christine Quinn's Faking The Villain Thing

Source: Us Weekly



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...