Skip to main content

Why Rob Zombie's The Munsters Trailer Looks So Bad | Screen Rant

The trailer for Rob Zombie’s The Munsters movie looks bad, and it's a disappointing start for the reboot as it fails to meet expectations of its faithfulness to the original. While director Rob Zombie has been open with audiences during the production process of The Munsters, the trailer gives the first real glimpse of the style and interpretations of the classic characters. With such promising teases through casting announcements, first-look images, and behind-the-scenes videos, Rob Zombie’s The Munsters movie trailer is a surprising disappointment.

The Munsters movie’s first official trailer reveals that the feature adaptation of the 1960s TV series will tell Lily and Herman Munster’s love story, with Grandpa seemingly rejecting the pairing. The colorful Munster family is seen going on various adventures alongside familiar characters from the original sitcom, with the end of the trailer showing Lily, Herman, and Grandpa moving into their iconic 1313 Mockingbird Lane house. Notably missing from The Munsters are Eddie and Marilyn, as Zombie's reboot apparently serves as a prequel to the classic TV show.

Related: Every Returning Munsters Character Confirmed For Rob Zombie's Reboot

The modern lens of gory horror director Rob Zombie was apt to see a slightly different take on the iconic characters, but what’s most surprising about The Munsters trailer is the perceivably low quality of the presentation. The hope is that the trailer simply does injustice to the real film through poor editing, as Zombie’s previous reveals for the Munsters reboot movie teased an authentic jump back into the eerie atmosphere of the classic sitcom. Unlike the confident ease of the original, Zombie’s The Munsters trailer exhibits a far more exaggerated version of the characters, with the personalities and mannerisms of Sheri Moon Zombie’s Lily Munster and Jeff Daniel Phillips’s Herman Munster failing to recapture the spirit of Yvonne De Carlo and Fred Gwynne’s versions. Even more disappointing is the missing smart satirical gothic sentiment of the original Munsters sitcom, with the exaggerated trailer, whether intentional or not, almost mocking the characters rather than paying tribute.

Despite Rob Zombie promising an authentic reboot of the iconic 1960s sitcom, The Munsters' trailer is a significant departure from the tone and style of the original. Perhaps due to Rob Zombie not being experienced in the family-friendly genre, the trailer points at The Munsters movie putting aside its gothic horror mood for a more kitschy interpretation of the characters. The Munsters movie's success requires some nostalgic faithfulness to the original sitcom, but the trailer suggests Zombie may have pushed this sentimentality too far, with the characters almost coming off as a parody of the 1960s Munster family.

The only character in Rob Zombie’s The Munsters reboot trailer who seems to accurately recreate the essence of the originals is Dan Roebuck’s Grandpa, whose mannerisms and voice are scarily reminiscent of Al Lewis’s character from the 1960s show. Sadly, the overinflated gestures and idiosyncrasies of Herman and Lily, who are at the center of Zombie’s Munsters movie, appear to be brand new characters altogether.

Rob Zombie is notable for his unique style and has come into criticism before due to his divisive interpretations of classic horror IP like Halloween, but The Munsters reboot originally presented a hopeful change of pace as he projected a faithfulness to every aspect of the beloved 1960s sitcom. While the trailer may be a bad development, the hope is that the completed The Munsters movie better lives up to the promising start of Rob Zombie’s reboot project.

Next: The Munsters Borrows Vincent Price’s Best Horror Trick



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...