Skip to main content

The MCU's X-Men Already Has A Unique Advantage Over Fox's Movies

The MCU will eventually adapt the iconic X-Men comics for the first time in live-action since Fox’s now-defunct X-Men franchise with a major advantage over its predecessor. Following the success of Blade but preceding Sam Raimi’s genre-redefining Spider-Man film, 2000’s X-Men helped bring Marvel’s iconic comic book characters to cinemas at a time when superhero fiction was, for the most part, struggling to be taken seriously by people outside of their fairly niche fandoms. The Fox X-Men series, despite lasting for 20 years, never truly embraced its comic source material, a pitfall its MCU successor is sure to avoid if its four Phases of properties are any indication.

Superhero fiction was often dismissed or at best viewed with skepticism by those in the films industry for a time, with Richard Donner’s Superman films owing their title character’s popularity to his broader cultural significance than the comics themselves and four Batman anthology films being successful in large part due to their robust marketing campaigns. It was the success of 1998’s Blade and 2000’s X-Men that proved that even the most obscure superhero properties (relatively speaking) could become successful film franchises. Ultimately, however, Raimi’s Spider-Man films paved the way for the MCU by embodying their superhero comic source material and being met with massive critical and commercial success in the process.

Related: X-Men Movie Director Bryan Singer Banned Comics On Set

Bryan Singer, whose first X-Men movie set the stage for the rest of Fox’s franchise, had little respect for Marvel’s X-Men comics, banning the cast members from reading them so that they would portray “three-dimensional characters” instead. However, Wolverine actor Hugh Jackman, one of the franchise’s most well-received elements, secretly read X-Men comics to prepare for the role (perhaps contributing to the success of his iconic performances). Although the films gradually grew closer to the comics as the franchise progressed, they never truly embraced the comics quite like the Raimi Spider-Man films or MCU, even during the height of both franchises. With a new, MCU-set, X-Men franchise in development, it’s safe to assume that it will be intrinsically more faithful to the X-Men comics and balance its vast cast of characters far better than Fox’s franchise.

For the most part, the Fox X-Men franchise failed to properly balance the ensemble cast of each film, focusing almost entirely on Wolverine, Professor X, Magneto, and Mystique (in the franchise’s later installments). While the X-Men comics have a vast array of heroes and antagonists, the Fox franchise struggled to meaningfully depict most of its characters and often repeated conflicts, rarely charting new territory in a series that lasted two decades. The vibrant colors, diverse cast of characters, and the juxtaposition of lighthearted adventure with darker subject matter from the X-Men comics were, unfortunately, absent.

The MCU’s first depiction of mutants, in the form of Patrick Stewart’s alternate universe Professor X in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, implies that the MCU’s eventual version will take inspiration from another X-Men adaptation. Professor X is introduced with the musical theme of the 90s X-Men: The Animated Series and shown using the show’s iconic hoverchair. This animated version of the X-Men, which precedes Singer’s films, follows the X-Men comics quite faithfully, and Doctor Strange 2’s references to it, along with the MCU’s proven reverence for Marvel’s comics, suggest that the upcoming MCU version of the X-Men will be a far better adaptation of their iconic characters and storylines than Fox’s film franchise.

Next: Is X-Men 97 In The MCU? Disney+ Mutant Debut Explained



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...