Skip to main content

A Look Back At Apple's FireWire And Why It's No Longer Used

Before Thunderbolt and USB emerged as the best options for a compact port that could transfer power and data, there was FireWire, and Apple played a role in both its creation and destruction. Though FireWire can still be used today — and can even best USB and Thunderbolt in niche areas — it's safe to say that USB4 and Thunderbolt 4 are the ports of the future. But for a short period, FireWire was the best of the best, and it facilitated the creation of a revolutionary product. Unlike many obsolete Apple products and standards, FireWire has not been forgotten. Adapters are still sold on the company's website that can connect a FireWire device from decades ago to the newest Macs featuring Apple Silicon.

If someone wasn't a technology enthusiast active in the late 1990s or early 2000s, it's likely they haven't even heard of FireWire, let alone know what it was. But, chances are, they have heard of the iPod, and there is simply no way the original iPod could have existed without FireWire. At the time, the iPod ran on a 1.8-inch Toshiba hard drive, which was essentially a scaled-down version of a desktop hard drive. This required a lot of power, and the USB specification wasn't capable of transferring power and data at that scale. But with FireWire, it was possible to power the hard drive while songs were being downloaded to the iPod, making the first-generation product possible. Later, USB would grow to support the iPod, but it all started with FireWire.

Related: Apple Killed The iPod, Ending A Historic 20-Year Legacy

FireWire was one of the first serial buses that could transmit data and power at high speeds. It was developed primarily by Apple, Sony and Panasonic — and the collaboration between those technology companies was intentional. Apple intended for FireWire to replace other older video and audio connection standards and began development in the late 1980s. It presented the product to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and finally released the connection standard to the public, named IEEE 1394 at the time. The 1394 Trade Association was created to promote the use of IEEE 1394 in other devices, but Apple was instrumental in the connection standard's success.

The name IEEE 1394 wasn't suitable for consumer marketing, and Apple knew this. As such, it started marketing the connection standard as FireWire, with a catchy name and a recognizable logo. In 2002, Apple came to an agreement with the 1394 Trade Association to make the FireWire name the universal brand identity for all IEEE 1394 connections, representing the company's commitment to the standard. Through 2011, nearly all Mac computers featured FireWire and select iPods connected through FireWire. The standard made recording easier in 2004 after a collaboration with Panasonic, and FireWire became a staple of early iMacs. However, the standard quickly became doomed without Intel's support, and Apple pivoted to a different connection standard.

Intel's support for any connection standard is crucial because support for connections has to be implemented by the chipset maker. The microchip fabrication company still makes the most-used processors in the world, and without their support, motherboard manufacturers had no reason to support FireWire at the board level. This ruled out support for nearly all PCs, which is a massive market. Moreover, the need for FireWire was dispelled as USB grew to be more powerful. When the standard was first introduced, it supported 400 megabits per second compared to USB's 12 megabits per second. Now, the USB4 standard supports 40 gigabits per second, and FireWire just couldn't keep up. Finally, in 2012, Apple went all-in on Thunderbolt support, forever dooming the FireWire standard.

Next: Should You Charge Your 2021 MacBook Pro Via MagSafe Or Thunderbolt 4?

Source: IEEE, Apple 1, 2



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...