Skip to main content

Bridgerton Season 2's Explanation For Simon's Absence Doesn't Fully Make Sense

Warning: Spoilers ahead for Bridgerton season 2.

Bridgerton season 2’s explanation for Simon’s absence doesn’t fully make sense. The end of Bridgerton season 1 saw Simon Basset and Daphne Bridgerton welcome a child together, wrapping up their storyline in more ways than one. And while it was established that Netflix’s romance series was going to shift its focus to Anthony’s search for a wife, fans were still surprised to discover Regé-Jean Page would not be gracing the screen as Simon in Bridgerton season 2.

In Bridgerton season 2, Daphne and Simon’s love story is over (at least onscreen) and, while Daphne is still very much a part of the family Bridgerton, the central characters of the new season are Anthony Bridgerton and Kate Sharma, who has arrived to London from India and who is immediately thrust into Anthony’s orbit. To be sure, Bridgerton season 2 doesn’t forget at all about Simon. Just because he’s not onscreen doesn’t mean he’s been tossed aside, never to be mentioned or anything.

Related: Bridgerton Season 2: All 6 New Characters Explained (Book Story & Future)

However, the reasons for Simon’s absence aren’t given. He isn’t away on business, nor has he had a falling out with the ton and the Bridgertons. An excuse for why he doesn’t show up to important events — such as Anthony’s wedding or the Bridgerton’s ball in episode 4 — doesn’t make sense precisely because of the lack of information provided. After all, he’s a part of the Bridgerton family now and his presence is likely expected for the social season and for pertinent events, especially considering that he and Anthony are friends. In season 2 episode 1, “Capital R Rake,” Daphne returns to her family’s home to witness sister Eloise’s debut for the ton’s social season, claiming she left her husband and child at home to be there for the momentous occasion. It works for the moment — that is, if Daphne had remained in Mayfair without heading back home to her new family.

Daphne reappears throughout Bridgerton season 2, but it’s always without Simon. August, Daphne and Simon’s son, makes a couple of appearances as well, and the eldest Bridgerton daughter briefly discusses her marriage to Simon to her mother Violet. But that is about it. Simon is clearly still around, alive and supposedly doing well, but there isn’t much of an explanation given as to his lack of presence onscreen. In the season 2 finale, Daphne reveals that six months being away is nothing for a newlywed couple. The initial comment was about Anthony and Kate, but Daphne’s response suggests Simon may have also been traveling. In one instance, Daphne’s own absence is explained by way of a cough baby August has developed, but still nothing clear about Simon.

Ultimately, the lack of Simon in Bridgerton season 2 doesn’t derail the story nor is his absence deeply felt since there is a new love story unfolding. However, the fact that the romance series never fully gives a concrete reason for the duke’s continued absence doesn’t fit in with the story and makes his disappearance all the more strange. Simon is still very much a part of Bridgerton’s world even though he isn’t onscreen, but the series could have done a better job explaining why he isn’t around in season 2.

Next: Every Time Daphne Appears In Bridgerton Season 2



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...