Skip to main content

Killing Eve Series Finale Ending Criticized By Original Author

Luke Jennings, the author of the book series on which Killing Eve was based, has criticized the show’s highly controversial season finale. The BBC America spy drama was originally based on Jennings’s 2017 thriller novel Codename Villanelle, although the show’s plotline diverged from the novel’s sequels, Killing Eve: No Tomorrow (published in 2018) and Killing Eve: Die For Me (published in 2020). The final episodes of Killing Eve aired on April 10th, 2022, and unfortunately disappointed some viewers who had been hoping for a happy ending for Eve (Sandra Oh) and Villanelle (Jodie Comer).

The last minutes of the season finale saw Villanelle unexpectedly shot and brutally murdered by an assassin. As Eve and Villanelle plunged into the River Thames, it was revealed that Carolyn (Fiona Shaw) had ordered the hit, likely in order to be let back into MI6. As Villanelle sank, Eve erupted from the water with a guttural scream as “The End” appeared on the screen. This tragic ending ultimately angered a lot of invested viewers, who argue that this is yet another example of the infamous ‘Bury Your Gays’ trope, where LGBTQ+ characters are disproportionally exploited and killed off for shock value.

Related: Killing Eve Season 4 Ending Explained (In Detail)

Codename Villanelle author Jennings is one of these fans, expressing his own disappointment with the ending that season 4 showrunner Laura Neal penned for his characters. Writing in The Guardian, Jennings calls the finale a “bowing to convention” for a series that has universally been praised for going against the grain. He goes on to say that a truly subversive storyline would have been to give Eve and Villanelle their own version of a happy ending, defying the fate of all the queer characters that have suffered on-screen before them. Read the full quote below:

“But the season four ending was a bowing to convention. A punishing of Villanelle and Eve for the bloody, erotically impelled chaos they have caused. A truly subversive storyline would have defied the trope which sees same-sex lovers in TV dramas permitted only the most fleeting of relationships before one of them is killed off (Lexa’s death in The 100, immediately after sleeping with her female love interest for the first time, is another example). How much more darkly satisfying, and true to Killing Eve’s original spirit, for the couple to walk off into the sunset together? Spoiler alert, but that’s how it seemed to me when writing the books.”

Jennings did pen a happy ending for Eve and Villanelle in Killing Eve: Die For Me, where they live a quiet domestic life together in the suburbs of St. Petersburg. With the show’s ending diverging so dramatically from the books, it's understandable why the author is so disappointed. Villanelle’s brutal and shocking death in the finale is made even worse by the happy, explicitly romantic moments that she and Eve got to share just minutes before, furthering the ‘Bury Your Gays’ trope as a symbolic punishment for characters who dare to act on their queer desire.

Lexa’s death in The 100 is one of the most prominent and inflammatory uses of the trope in recent years, so Jennings comparing it with the Killing Eve finale is quite damning. The spy series could have done something exciting and new with such a compelling queer relationship, but instead, the writers threw all that potential away for a deeply unsatisfying tragic ending. It is extremely disappointing to see a previously subversive show like Killing Eve use such a harmful cliché in its final moments, inevitably tarnishing the show’s legacy, at least in Jennings' eyes.

Next: Killing Eve's Series Finale Failed To Solve Its 2 Biggest Mysteries

Source: The Guardian



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pet Sematary: Bloodlines Interview — Makeup Head Annick Chartier On Subtle Horror & Era Recreation

Learn the origins of one of Stephen King's most memorable characters in Pet Sematary: Bloodlines . The movie centers on a younger Jud Crandall as he attempts to leave his hometown of Ludlow, though when a childhood friend returns from the Vietnam War in mysterious fashion, he learns of a dark secret those in the town have been guarding.

Every Dragon In House Of The Dragon Explained

House of the Dragon is the newest HBO show set in the world of Game of Throne s and is set to outshine its sequel series in the number of dragons included in the show. Given that House of the Dragon is based on George R. R. Martin's novel Fire & Blood , the fantastical beasts are expected to be included to a great extent. As Fire & Blood centers around the Targaryen family line, House of the Dragon will be borrowing from many aspects of the book and showcasing the Targaryens at their most powerful, as will also be the case with the family's fire-breathing companions.

Which X-Men Character Are You, Based On Your MBTI® Type?

Even more so than other superhero teams in Marvel and DC, the X-Men offers a lot in the variety of characters who have served as members. Most mutants in Marvel have been X-Men, and these characters came in all shapes and sizes, many with overbearing personalities and others more recluse, traversing the  MBTI® Type scale. Led by Professor X, many of the members of the X-Men started there as kids while others joined as adults. There have been heroes and villains who worked on the team and on the island of Krakoa, every mutant lives there together in peace. With so much drama and complex personalities throughout the history of the X-Men, there is an MBTI® Type for everyone. 10 INTJ-A - Professor X Professor Charles Xavier is clearly an Architect when it comes to his MBTI® Type. Not only that, but he is an Assertive Architect. He is a self-assured man who values organization and rationality when solving problems. This started out when he created the X-Men and became more controllin