Skip to main content

Killing Eve Series Finale Ending Criticized By Original Author

Luke Jennings, the author of the book series on which Killing Eve was based, has criticized the show’s highly controversial season finale. The BBC America spy drama was originally based on Jennings’s 2017 thriller novel Codename Villanelle, although the show’s plotline diverged from the novel’s sequels, Killing Eve: No Tomorrow (published in 2018) and Killing Eve: Die For Me (published in 2020). The final episodes of Killing Eve aired on April 10th, 2022, and unfortunately disappointed some viewers who had been hoping for a happy ending for Eve (Sandra Oh) and Villanelle (Jodie Comer).

The last minutes of the season finale saw Villanelle unexpectedly shot and brutally murdered by an assassin. As Eve and Villanelle plunged into the River Thames, it was revealed that Carolyn (Fiona Shaw) had ordered the hit, likely in order to be let back into MI6. As Villanelle sank, Eve erupted from the water with a guttural scream as “The End” appeared on the screen. This tragic ending ultimately angered a lot of invested viewers, who argue that this is yet another example of the infamous ‘Bury Your Gays’ trope, where LGBTQ+ characters are disproportionally exploited and killed off for shock value.

Related: Killing Eve Season 4 Ending Explained (In Detail)

Codename Villanelle author Jennings is one of these fans, expressing his own disappointment with the ending that season 4 showrunner Laura Neal penned for his characters. Writing in The Guardian, Jennings calls the finale a “bowing to convention” for a series that has universally been praised for going against the grain. He goes on to say that a truly subversive storyline would have been to give Eve and Villanelle their own version of a happy ending, defying the fate of all the queer characters that have suffered on-screen before them. Read the full quote below:

“But the season four ending was a bowing to convention. A punishing of Villanelle and Eve for the bloody, erotically impelled chaos they have caused. A truly subversive storyline would have defied the trope which sees same-sex lovers in TV dramas permitted only the most fleeting of relationships before one of them is killed off (Lexa’s death in The 100, immediately after sleeping with her female love interest for the first time, is another example). How much more darkly satisfying, and true to Killing Eve’s original spirit, for the couple to walk off into the sunset together? Spoiler alert, but that’s how it seemed to me when writing the books.”

Jennings did pen a happy ending for Eve and Villanelle in Killing Eve: Die For Me, where they live a quiet domestic life together in the suburbs of St. Petersburg. With the show’s ending diverging so dramatically from the books, it's understandable why the author is so disappointed. Villanelle’s brutal and shocking death in the finale is made even worse by the happy, explicitly romantic moments that she and Eve got to share just minutes before, furthering the ‘Bury Your Gays’ trope as a symbolic punishment for characters who dare to act on their queer desire.

Lexa’s death in The 100 is one of the most prominent and inflammatory uses of the trope in recent years, so Jennings comparing it with the Killing Eve finale is quite damning. The spy series could have done something exciting and new with such a compelling queer relationship, but instead, the writers threw all that potential away for a deeply unsatisfying tragic ending. It is extremely disappointing to see a previously subversive show like Killing Eve use such a harmful cliché in its final moments, inevitably tarnishing the show’s legacy, at least in Jennings' eyes.

Next: Killing Eve's Series Finale Failed To Solve Its 2 Biggest Mysteries

Source: The Guardian



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CBS' Ghosts: Every Main Ghost Time Period & Backstory Explained

One of CBS' newest sitcoms,  Ghosts , features a cast full of spectral characters that each hail from a distinct time period and come with their own unique backstory and death. Though each of the eight ghosts has a wildly different perspective based on their different experiences throughout history, they nonetheless form a sort of family, which is one of the show's greatest charms. After all, being stuck with the same people for all of eternity allows for plenty of time to get to know each other. Ghosts , which is an adaptation of a BBC show of the same name, stars Utkarsh Ambudkar and Rose McIver (who played Liv Moore on five seasons of  iZombie ) as Jay and Sam, a young couple who inherit a mansion in upstate New York. To their surprise, however, the house also comes with several ghostly inhabitants, who Sam is able to see after a near-death experience. These are Thorfinn (Devan Long), Sasappis (Román Zaragoza), Isaac (Brandon Scott Jones), Hetty (Rebecca Wisocky...

The Hateful Eight's Original Ending Explained (& Why Tarantino Changed It)

The Hateful Eight has an ending full of blood and betrayal, as expected from any Quentin Tarantino movie, but this wasn’t the original ending – here’s why he changed it. Tarantino has explored different genres throughout his career; though he’s best known for his crime movies like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction , he's also visited genres like martial arts (with both Kill Bill  films) and black comedy ( Once Upon a Time in Hollywood ). In addition, he's shared his version of westerns with Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight , with the latter going through some problems and creative changes even before it began shooting. Set in 1870, Tarantino's The  Hateful Eight follows eight strangers, all with different (and secret) motivations, who end up in a stagecoach lodge after seeking refuge from a blizzard. These characters are Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson), John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell), Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Chris Mannix (Walton Gog...

Why Spider-Man 3's Uncle Ben Retcon Doesn't Change Peter's Origin

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 is often criticized for a major retcon made to Uncle Ben’s death , but this retcon ultimately doesn’t change Peter Parker’s classic origin story. Raimi’s third film in the iconic Spider-Man trilogy is often criticized, perhaps unfairly. While the film suffers from too many character arcs and plot threads and would have been better as two or three separate films, it does a more than adequate job adapting the Spider-Man comics and telling a sincere story about relatable, flawed, characters who are intertwined with the extraordinary, just as Stan Lee and Steve Ditko intended when co-creating the character. Uncle Ben’s retconned death may alter classic elements from the comic version, but it retains its most important aspects in regards to Peter’s characterization. 2002’s Spider-Man is, for much of the film’s first half, a faithful adaptation of Spider-Man’s 1962 origin story in issue 15 of the Amazing Fantasy comics. An awkward social pariah, Pete...